I agree partially because the sale of pirated objects deletes the true coptright of producers. To create anything, artists invest time, money and then the work done, they need some form of financial return and general recognition.
Piracy is crime, however, the price of original products are expensive, so in most cases people prefer to circumvent by the easy acess and low cost.

Do you agree with piracy? Why ?

No. To pirate is a crime that should be controlled. To copy illegal CD's and DVD's, beetween other file is frequent, since to buy has a high price and it more difficult, the convenience or even the financial reality to end up doing leaving only one way : to pirate. In that case, how to make a illegal copy, the correct would be establish an accessible price, where everybody can reach without leave the crime of copy to spread much more, leading on to take in account that the original products have bigger cost that the brazilian or part large can reach.



Aluno : Alexandre Nascimento Souza 

Our society presents a factor very common among the people which is the access at music and movies that belong download throught pirate websites .tre pirates have them self make a means of survival for many people, however, the house and senate create project of law to forbid the use of websites how these, this action bring large problem.

Samayane dos santos Lima. 

Do you agree with piracy? why?

  The piracy was an alternative found by persons to acess medias.. That previously could not br avaliable.
Because DVD's, CD's and another medias are expansive and many persons can't buy, so the piracy is the only alternative to have contact with, musics, movies and etc.
  But the atists lose money and it is dificuet sell their work legally, piracy is incorrect. But is necessary todaynbecause prices are high, is necessary find another alternative. That help the artists and buyer.
  An outlet can be sell dawnloads cheaper internet dispensing costs with materials because everybody has internet today.
  So everybody can win, both artists as buyer.

At present, the social goup support their call and relationship based, mainly by internet, means with the piracy has won cosiderable expansion. The piracy is a factor that ease transition of goods, general. not viable, it is used for possibility the access to less.  

Samara dos Santos Lima.

Internet piracy

the piracy on internet should not be considered crime because the internet should be free to all , beause million of internet users access all the days and share information and sell products. The project of low whtewashed by eua known as s.o.p.a has as priority to the campances of intertainment publishers , printed , pharmaceutical , the goal of block acsess and internetional sites that markit stolen contests or fake products . the defenders of freedon on web collld by a boycott of law ites the only form of internet more poor had acsess to several information wethhout self cost .

Do you agree with piracy ? Why ?
# No, because piracy is considered dishonest and illegal work, where people make copies of various products (which are somewhat "Dear," for most of the population) and sells them for a cheaper price in camels, domestic markets and external in a given country. Thus, pirates often buy things without knowing, because of this "black market" that accompanies the whole society.




Obs: eu não corrigi esse texto antes dele ser postado aqui Nadiny! 
Douglas

Desfazer edições

Theme : Do you agree with piracy ? Why ?


Piracy is blamed by most people, but most people buy.

The reality is that prices are too high and most peaple can 

not always buy the material produced by the artists. 

The internet promotes a lot of songs and movies for free 

that devalues work, but the internet can be used like a 

resource twin money. 

And artists should encourage the purchase of these 

original medias finding ways to reach most of the public.  

Aluno : Lucas Santos da Silva

Do you agree with piracy ? why ?

Yes. To pirate is not something all will seen in society, proper to of legitimacy, and the copyright of who create. however in developing country. The access to original file is little. When to agree of book, movie, CD's and DVD's apart from the access is restrictive, the price is high, not leaving ather alternative unless to join to piraty. In developed countries happen the opposite, the access is bigger, and the price reachable for everybody. This way, in countries like Brazil, while the policy of price does not change, the alternative to access these means is to pirate.

Do you agree with piracy? Why?

Today, the piracy is the big problem of the communications market. By one side, there is the problem of copyright that many companies struggle to preserv. The market of piracy is involved in: clothes, books, software and another products that can be copied. The difficulty to eliminate piracy is in the culture of many countries, for example: The Brazil. Piracy is detrimental to the freedom of the copyrights of artists and companies and also affect the consumer because it makes the original products more expensive.

The piracy is crime, both in developed coutries a nd underveloped

      The piracy is crime, both in developed coutries and underveloped.
      In some countries the feathers are more rigorous bit in another are not, for example do downloands in EUA are illicits can put a person on jail, but in Brazil you can do free downloands, and buy DVD's and CD's pirates on streets, and there are no problems.
      Buying pirated products raise the prices and do not valorize the artist work, to combat the piracy some countries use rigorous laus, so the piracy can't go on.
      The Brasilian government have made rigorous laus for collaborat with the artists.



Matheus Alves Cruz

Do you agree with piracy ? Why ?

 Piracy is a very extensive, complex and has many angles by which can be analyzed, which can generate much discussion. One of the most common questions when it comes to piracy is: Why piracy funding a crime? Perhaps this is one of the most controversial and difficult QUESTIONS to see in piracy. It has both positive and negative SIDES. They are: A simpler way to get the product, with free downloads, etc. But it has its downside. If the piracy dominating one day, there will be more interesting for companies investing in portals, new ideas for games, movies, news and everything that involves the commercial market. And WITH all comes the question: is there a solution? There are several ways and actions to solve this problem, perhaps one of the biggest challenges of international trade of the XXI century. XXI Century presents a fatal chaeacteristic to sustained growth of economy world and inhibits innovation, making investments viable. Reduction of taxes, punishment to consumers, etc. The only certainty is that more and more companies invest in combating piracy, money that could be spent on things, LET’S say, more useful.

PIRACY

Piracy is a serious problem of modern society, where many claim to practice because of unemployment, however the sale of products without permission and without paying copyright is a crime.

There are A number of pirated goods such as clothing, perfumes, CDs, medicines, shoes and many others. The consumers of pirated products try to justify the purchase, claiming that they are cheaper, but these goods are of poor quality, often harming the health of individuals who acquires. Besides the damage in the economy because these products do not pay taxes, which could be passed on to society in improving health, education and security.

Ramom Souza Felix

The piracy

In contemporany society it is extreme difficult combat the piracy, because with ease of access to the internet was difficult as fighting the globlal warmig. However try to combat the piracy would be necessary lowering the price of products, being available to most people in the financial sector it is more feasible download a game than purchasing it, such as the Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 that cost about R$146,00. So, the disparity it is the main agente founder piracy.

Abdias Carvalho

Do you agree with piracy ? Why?

    The consume market became each teme more attractive , mainly to capitalist , that influences the society the attainment of new products , with a great drive commercial, in which piracy , inds dominating the market ,as a form of more easy and cheap practeces.
The internet , is a great tool available to several ,became a main weapon no only to the users that use to the realization of illegal dawnloads , as to the foreign mafias that are strengthened with the piracy of several productos.
However , the laws created against that practure are effective.As the project SOPA of USA , that tries to control the piracy and new  lance more a new project of laws that aims in determine the block sites as google and facebook , all the contints considered suspects.Generating a dessatesfaction in population and of other companies as twitter  and wikipedia ,by a viw repressed of freedom of expression of each individual , in that the last protest remaened outsede air on 05-18-2012(May,18,2012).
This form ,the laws more effective are good to control of illegal practives.But the sites that provide contents  non authorezed , are dilficult of control since there are powerful people in a indirect approve that practive.

Piracy not always

                                                             

From the XXI century there was a high rate of piracy cases. This crime is considered ambiguous, because it benefits and harms involved, these cases began to extend by everyone from the great technological growth.
Many people practice actions that are considered piracy and which are not always seen as crime the main cases are the use of commercial property e non commercial without autorization or wethout royalty of copyright such as download a CD of music on the internet, since using a inappropriate use these assets would be impossible to complete prohibitios and punishiments for these cases, because there would be a tecnological wear besides harming both sides owner and "pirates"

Do you agree with piracy? Why?

No. The piracy of certain manner causes a disrespect with the industry that property artistry and commerce. There is also a worry with the drop of the original goods produced. It is notorious that this fact is becoming a constant element in the society. There are several kinds of piracy, and this is related to corganized crime, and still can be connected with the infantile exploration and piracy of some goods, can pose serious health to the consumer .

I am against , because the piracy is an economic , social and cultural problem .Because we noticed that it is , increasing more and more , harming ; singers , authors and records .It is a damage , also for the whole society , because the taxes stop being paid and invested in social services . The piracy is so present in our day-to-day that a lot of times it is seen with naturalness.

Do you agree with piracy? Why?

                                          

    The piracy is a illegal practive, that reproduces, selles and distributs fake products. This cause losses to the economy of the country, and puts in risk the health of people.

    There are today on market a great diversity of pirated products that call the attention of people by be much more cheao tham the orgininal, because does not pay taxes and neither copy rigtht. However in the goods are found cancerian substances in its composition, products that break easily and other that already are bad before the same be sold.

    There are people that advocate the piracy, because sees it as form of support, however it is a criminal act, because is an unfair competition to legalized productes and generate unemployment and losses for the goverment.

I agree partially because the sale of pirated objects deletes the true coptright of producers. To create anything, artists invest time, money and then the work done, they need some form of financial return and general recognition.

Piracy is crime, however, the price of original products are expensive, so in most cases people prefer to circumvent by the easy acess and low cost.

- Theme : Do you agree with piracy ? Why ?

        No . Because piracy is a crime that refers to the counterfeiting of products without autorization of the owners. In contemporary society, the piracy has grown increasingly becoming a popular habit.

       Moreover, as much as piracy is crime, the Brazilian population has used it, example : copies of CDs and DVDs, the most used. Exist other products that sound pirated and bring harm to health such as : medicine and sun glasses. Piracy is a serious problem and we must fight it, to avoid after the more damage.

                      

The law says that it is crime. I usually respect the laws because they normally are the end item of many quarrels among all the involved parts. To respect the laws also in the ones of the moral to demand our rights. One is not about "legalism”. But it is a question of “to be in peace" with all the involved parts. To walk with the conscience. For example: they buy a pirated film that only attends one or two times. On the contrary of this, they could rent.

not because the products are not good in quality and bring basses the business that manufacture the product of good quality, because by other side,brings losses to the most of population domagung the appliance .leading so against position of nation is at low but do not ply duty that are low and abligatory of all citzen

no because the products are not good in quality and bring basses the business that manufacture the  product of good quality, because by other side,brings losses to the most of population domagung  the appliance .leading so  against position of nation is at low but  do not ply duty that are low and abligatory of all citzen

Have three entities : contente developers, content providers and content pirates. The later are thieves. Talking any property, real or intelectual, isstealing. Contente providers that knowing participate or foment the practice are acessories to the crime. So their protests are a duplicitous and self interested.

The SOPA while well intentioned, it doesn t sound like a pratical solution. 

In your opnion, why is so hard to save the planet?

It's hard to save the planet because we are a fully capitalist society, where there is interference of the competition in the preservation of the environment. It's though this characteristic that we saw what happened with the decline of the Banks when government cooperated with more than 100 (hundred) billion dollars, and to help planet would be only 7 (seven) million. This proves that man be is more concerned with capitalism, or obtain more profit. and do not value something so important which is our planet, and every day by day it's hard to save it.

GABARITO CADERNO DE ATIVIDADES: 3º ANO - CONDITIONALS

11)
A) HAD / WOULDN'T
B) WOULD GO / WEREN'T
C) EAT / WILL LOOK
D) WON'T WIN / DON'T WORK
E) DON'T EAT / WON'T GET

12)
A) MY PARENTS WILL BE MAD AT ME
B) IF MY BEST FRIEND LIES TO ME
C) IF I WIN LOTTERY PRIZE
D) I'LL ASK FOR AN AUTOGRAPH

13)
a) If Katrina gets a good grade, her father will let her travel with her friends.
b) If I arrive home early, I will cook a special dinner.
c) If my mother finds a good job, she will buy me a new jacket
d) If Maria weren’t happy, she wouldn’t be smiling.
e) If I had a lot of money, I would travel around the world.
f) If my team won the game, I would throw a huge party.
g) If Bush hadn’t been reelected, the war would have been avoided.
h) If Hans had moved to the US, he wouldn’t have become a famous soccer player in Germany.
i) If Melissa had found a new boyfriend, she would have forgotten Chris.


14)
a) If I liked math, I would get good grades.
b) If my mother had made lunch yesterday, we wouldn’t have eaten out.
c) If Tina ate less, she wouldn’t be getting fat.
d) If Jack didn’t buy a car, he would need to take the bus.
e) If Peter hadn’t been sick, he would have done his homework.

26)
a) Sasquatch, Yeti, Skunk Ape or Yowie
b) in isolated moutains areas in every corner of the globe - from North America to Australia
c) It is described as taller than a common mans, covered with long brown or white hair, with a strong, repugnant odor and large feet.
d) It might be a kind of plesiosaur
e) chickens, ducks, turkeys, rabbits and goats


OBS: AS OUTRAS QUESTÕES (15 A 25) FORAM GABARITADAS NA SALA DE AULA, SE PRECISAR DE MAIS ALGUMA QUESTÃO, DEIXE COMENTÁRIO PEDINDO A RESOLUÇÃO.

In the truth to save the planet is not difficult, what it is difficult is to make with that the people stop to dissimulate, and to wait for the others to take an attitude that saves the planet, she is not necessary to wait for great attitudes, is enough that all we let us take small, as to save water, to use recycled material more, not to pollute rivers lakes and etc. But without a doubt none is necessary that the countries diminish the amount of pollutants emitted in air through the chimneys of manufacture and industries, what it is most difficult, therefore if the countries to diminish the amount of emitted pollutants this also will diminish its production, that it means reduction of profits, what nobody wants.

                                                                                           Ádriann Matheus

why is difficult to save the planet ?

Nowadays, it is difficult to save our own planet, because each one has the duty and the obligation of doing its part, even so a lot of people is not aware about preservation of the environment. Like this instead of preserving the nature they destroys it. In many cities the garbage produced by the population is accumulated in inappropriate places without selective collection. The population, also, doesn't collaborate in the preservation of the planet. A lot of people trow garbage everywhere, they chop down trees, they provoke fire and etc.

Why is so hard to save the planet?

We live in a digital age, of the information, of the dinamis. In the middle of the so much globalization, we stop to preocupy about the planet that so much offers to us now a days we to discren with a bank crises of some power nations and the goverment applies millions of dolars to help. In hewever when we talk about save the planet, the money is inasccessible , the money is not the dispose ! This will end ?

Why is so hard to save the planet?

The  biggest difficulty in save the planet is lack of consciousness of people, because now what greenhouse is a chaos nature are big responsible by emission of CO².Therefore is necessary that society eases that situation: each one doing  part.

The global warming is created mainly by emissions of CO2, in great part coming for industries that produce it in high numbers. Whe we about production we assimilates to capitalism that the more produces, better is. And how to save the planet when your worst enemy it socio of capitalism? And the coutries that more pollute are capitalist , that aim first its production, its growth and development, and putin second plan to planet that we live without measuring that industral and emissions of pollutants goes against to what we call of "SUSTENTAINABILITY" .

Aluno: Alexandre Nascimento

Why is so hard to save the planet?

    Nowadays the capitalism dominate the world and this idealism is straight linked with consume .when to do this a question? It is difficult to save the world if the men that do no want to or do no have sensitivity in relationship when the problem is the planet; because lack of warning for the bad use of nature is not the reason. Profit is the main point in capitalism, therefore is more interesting to have profit and destroy the planet than invest in its rescue.  

                                                                                                                     Samara dos Santos Lima.

WORLD FINALS

 

Since the first industrial revolution the world passed for an difficult period. Factories and cars are the most polluters that exist, the CO2 generated by them cause climate changes and cause the greenhouse effect.

Today it is difficult to solve this problem because not all countries want to collaborate with the reduction of emission of gases. The capitalism left us hostage of money and with that also of productivity and when a coutry produces more, more pollution it causes and more difficult is to salve the problem.

Why is so hard to save the planet ?

Day by day it is difficult save the planet, with many disasters, melting of the glacier seas and city polluted finally with so global warming that is provoked byus, human beings obstructing the possibilities of we he a world healthier.
It is difficult save the planet because we do not do enough to try to improve the earth where we live, we could try at least, to reduce the pollution.



                                                                                                Anna karolline Carvalho Guimarães.

Why is so hard to save the planet ?

This is a question that many people search the answer  however save  the planet is a well difficult task because so many things should be analyzed and put in practice, such as: the reduction of emission of gases, the drecrease of deforestation and  reforestation.

In a capitalist society the main factor it is the industrialization that prevents the contribution of society to save the world.

Like this agreement between the countries would of  extreme importance  for the planet, but could to get in paper should run

                              

How to save the planet?

 The capitalism has brought damage to the planet and in consequence to the humans.

We are insert in a totally consumerist society thanks to the technological evolution present in all world, this world be a negative factor for environment.

In the XXI century would be indispensable its use, but we can’t ignore the consequence of it we must search and put in practice the best possible solution for this problem.   

In your opnion, why is it so hard to save the planet ?

Because lack of awareness in people and sensitivity to projects the preservation of environment. 

These attitudes future consequences such as a signifcant increase of temperature and the exhausted of water in part of the globe.

Recently it was created a challenge to advance a global agreement that aimed the reduction of emission of greenhouse gases in atmosphere, however not all the countries were pleased about to cut these emissions.

The discussion about of how to save the planet is something discussed for a long time, but the policies about that project is not seen with extreme importance an alarming fact that worries future generations.

Why is it so hard to save the planet ?

    Is not easy to save the planet from the threats , where, the negative balance between the needs and availability has incriased each year. The failures, the degradation and huge factores reveal their own whys. Meenting the changing the paradigm of society. To try to alleviate these problems, is necessary to handle other forms " inner" the planet , using different energy sources , the way of the usage of the soil, moving deep the economy, consume less and better.

Why is it so hard to save the planet ?

   In a capitalist world , where the single appreciation is by the profit , the preoccupation with the enveronment becomes useless.So conferences and agreements among the countries has happenine , with the goal todo better world. But these countries do not enter in concordance by the fact that productivety can suffer damage.

  One of the main enveronmental agreements was the Kyoto Protocol , which aimed the decrease of pollutantes in atmosphere as main the CO2. This treaty emerged by the that process of industrialization. But one of the main pollutants countries , is USA, do not segned the treaty ,dificulting an efficiente action of a overall agreement.

 This difficultie to get a broad agreemet in has significant effect , since the main pollutantes do not assume its true paper againest enveronmental problems . Because , they aim in ferst their profitabelitus with benefits those countries that pollute less.

Why is it so hard to save the planet ?

That the planet is in decline everybody knows. But, why the most of the people behaves like this is a lie? Everyday, we see in television the challenge that the earth has faced about the enviromental problems. And even so, the men keep degrading our environmental. Although the efforts of some people to save what remains of the earth planet, what we see is a try to soften the global calamity. This is happening because the importance that people give to the money today. We live to work and we work to consume. The addiction to consumption is increasingly rooted in the people. Even in socialist societies, the people become capitalists. And all this "talk" about to save the planet is coming a global joke when the countries are "interested in the matter".

In your opnion, why is it so hard to save the planet?

the Global Warning is an normal process taht occurs with the planet, however, mankind with emissions of gas (CO2, CH4 e N2O mainly) and the deforestation, accelerate that process, puting risk the survival in earth. Several agreements, about climate have already made, the more important The Kyoto Protocol. That has the objective to decrease the emissions of gas in more polluted countries, however, not all countries are willing to do sth to decrease its production because of greenhouse effect, making difficut to find a solution for a critical problem to ignored by developed countries.

Why is it so hard save the planet ?

We have in highly capitalist World in whitch makes its denotative meaning, wich is the host of healthily and without aggression to it, and passes to the connotative sense for some coutries than that is of contemp, such coutries are not the "low level" or poor, but those who use and abuse of natural resouces do not give a damn about the consequences that will surely come, though it is noticeable the feeling of security, for taking the temperature increse as an exzample, we see thal coutries that cause this problem do not suffer from its consequences, soon they arranje a way to circumvent this, because those other coutries, so lucky and so did not suffer from this problem and are left with the felling of inefficiency.

The most difficultie to ave planet is the men thei do not think in commo and cause, florest devastation.

The world knowsand peo ple know the future will not see big florest and weather. From now we start suffering with greenhouse effect.

The climate change day by day is more confusion and strange, for example: antartida little bylittle the local ice is melting and cause catastrophe and disaster. Because the sea deepness cause floods in diferents regions the disafforestation causes dry region therainis less favoured, inthat region that happen lackof water and people and animal starttos uffer; that happensin difarents parts of the world.

Durban brought new ideas but insufficient to help florest devastation around the world. People know there are big florest in this planet and they are thinking what to do tobring back the question frou the middle to the center of struggle because the climate change is coming very quick.

Why is it so hard save the planet ?

 The earth planet is our house, this is why, we must to take care of it with love and care. And above all preserve the nature for that we have a good quality of life.

 Unfortunately many people do not have conscience of it, for exemple, the industries that pollute, the farmers that deforest and the families that waste water and food. Those factors complicate the health of earth which is going from bad to worse, because that is very difficult save the planet, and that can bring us irreversible consequences.

 We have to organize the awareness of people, denounce enviranmental and charge the proper punishments. 

Maria Graziela Andrade. 

We live in a captalist world where the people are warried in consume, consume and consume, they don't remenber that have a planet to take care. Consuption is the cause for the disease of the earth, we want a pratical life, more comfortable with out know that comfortability only brings problems.

Global warming is our great challenge we need to win this challenge to survive, if we want, is not difficult.

Why is it so hard save the planet ?

         Nowadys, the earth planet has been one of the uttermost victims of global warming that is caused by human being. Many of these causes has been present in a direct and exposed way, due to a lack of raising of awareness in people .

         The duty to help ourselves, sometimes seems a problem too big for most of society. However, save the world, may seem an easy task before an attitude that need all attention. So, the idea and perhaps the questioning of many countries can be resolved in the manner how human being sees themselves about that great globalization.

In your opinion, why isit so hard to save the planet?

Through this capitalist world, where the government is based in profit, and the countries act in owns interest, is more easy to save a bank, than the planet.
Being the center of the capitalism an having the biggest economy in the world, the United States of America is also the biggest polluter, and through its hegemonia it was the country that more gave work for sign the kyoto protocol.
In a capitalist world, reduce the pollution it is create unemployment and reduce profit.

                    Who will save the planet?

Currently it's very difficult save the planet, because the main polluters not joined the "saviors" of planet that is the Kyoto Protocol. Those countries that do not joined the agreement were United States of America and China that have the objective to produce more, in other words, increasingly pollution in the planet.

The United States for being a world power produces a lot and not lose the status of "higher potency", already the China also produces in large scale trying to exceed the United States. But who will bear the consequence? Probably the planet will not support that dispute so fierce to see who polluter more.

Abdias Fernandes Carvalho

Why is it so hard save the planet?

While the people laugh, the planet cry !
The difficulty in save the planet coming from good part of the big ambition of the developed nation and underdeveloped nations are seeking grow more and seed by a capitalist greed that daily take people fat living a consumerist exaggerated life and it is by this fact that is given so little importance to the preservation of the planet because what matter consumerist many it is the profit.

Entenda como funcionam as eleições americanas

Republicano que disputará presidência contra Obama em 6 de novembro será definido em prévias do partido que podem durar até julho

Carolina Cimenti, de Nova York | 02/01/2012 08:00

Foto: Getty Images

Pré-candidatos republicanos (esq. para dir.) Santorum, Perry, Romney, Gingrich, Ron Paul, Bachmann e Huntsman são vistos antes de debate em 15 de dezembro de 2011

Com o cáucus de terça-feira em Iowa, começa a disputa entre pré-candidatos republicanos para definir quem representará o partido contra o presidente dos EUA, o democrata Barack Obama, nas eleições presidenciais de 6 de novembro.
Após a desistência em 3 de dezembro de Herman Cain em meio a denúncias de que assediou sexualmente funcionárias e manteve um caso extraconjugal por 13 anos, há sete candidatos na disputa (em ordem alfabética): Jon Huntsman, Michelle Bachmann, Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich, Ron Paul, Rick Perry e Rick Santorum.
Infográfico: Veja infográfico com miniperfil dos concorrentes
A previsão é de que os eleitores participem até fim de junho de prévias nos 50 Estados americanos para definir o candidato do Partido Republicano, que esteve pela última vez no poder durante os dois mandatos de George W. Bush (2001-2009).
Se a disputa não for acirrada, há chances também de ser definida mais cedo, na chamada Super Terça-Feira de 6 de março, quando haverá votações em mais de dez Estados.
Agenda: Confira o calendário da disputa presidencial dos EUA
Cada Estado escolhe qual tipo de prévia adotar: primárias ou cáucus. E o que são cada uma delas?
A primária é uma votação secreta tradicional, com urnas e papéis, organizada normalmente pelo governo local e aberta a todos os eleitores registrados. Nas primárias fechadas, os eleitores podem participar apenas da votação do partido em que estão registrados (ou seja, só votam em uma prévia republicana os eleitores dessa legenda). Nas abertas, podem votar na primária do partido que escolherem, independentemente de sua filiação partidária. A maioria dos Estado faz primárias fechadas.

Os cáucuses, que também podem ser fechados ou abertos, são encontros que incluem debates, discursos e divisão de grupos. Quando eles começam, os eleitores se dividem de acordo com o candidato que apoiam. Para persuadir os indecisos a aderir a seu grupo, os eleitores discursam em apoio a seu candidato. No final, os organizadores contam quantos votos cada candidato recebeu.
Votação indireta
Mas nos dois casos (cáucus e primárias), os votos não vão diretamente para os candidatos. Eles na verdade determinam a quantidade de delegados (ou representantes) que cada candidato terá na convenção nacional do partido - na qual um candidato será oficialmente aclamado depois das primárias e cáucuses.
O número de delegados de cada Estado é definido pela população. A Califórnia, por exemplo, tem 55 representantes, enquanto Nova York conta com 29 e o Alasca somente com 3. Por isso, é mais importante vencer em alguns Estados do que em outros.
Para distribuir os delegados, os democratas usam um método proporcional. Cada candidato recebe o número de delegados correspondente ao percentual de votos nas primárias ou cáucuses. No Partido Republicano, um Estado pode escolher o método proporcional ou o do "ganhador leva tudo", no qual o candidato que recebeu a maioria dos votos em determinada prévia ganha todos os delegados correspondentes.
O vencedor entre os pré-candidatos republicanos será anunciado oficialmente na convenção do partido em Tampa, na Flórida, prevista para 27 de agosto. Como o presidente Obama já anunciou sua decisão de concorrer à reeleição, os democratas não realizarão prévias no partido neste ano. De qualquer forma, o líder americano será aclamado oficialmente como candidato do partido na convenção democrata, que ocorre em Charlotte, Carolina do Norte, em 3 de setembro.
Eleição propriamente dita
Em 6 de novembro, os eleitores comparecerão às urnas para escolher entre Obama e o futuro candidato republicano. E, assim como nas primárias e cáucuses, os votos em cada Estado serão usados para determinar quantos delegados cada um terá no chamado Colégio Eleitoral - que determina o presidente americano.
Saiba mais: Entenda como funciona o Colégio Eleitoral americano
Como já ocorreu no passado, há a possibilidade de um candidato com maior porcentual de votos populares não vencer por não conquistar número suficiente de delegados no Colégio Eleitoral. Exemplo disso foi a eleição de 2000, quando Bush foi eleito pela primeira vez ao vencer o democrata Al Gore.
Naquele ano, Bush recebeu 47,87% do total dos votos, enquanto Al Gore obteve 48,38%. Mas, como venceu em Estados com maior peso no Colégio Eleitoral (após semanas de contestação na Justiça da Flórida), mudou-se para a Casa Branca no ano seguinte apesar de ter recebido 500 mil votos a menos que seu concorrente.

Eleições nos EUA 2012

• Veja o especial sobre eleições nos EUA 2012
• Em 2012, pior rival de Obama é seu próprio governo
• Quem são os principais pré-candidatos republicanos?
• Ocupe Wall Street deve influenciar eleições nos EUA
• Internet será arma crucial na campanha dos EUA
• Radicalismo do Tea Party pode dividir republicanos
• Quem paga a campanha presidencial dos EUA?
• Saiba quais presidentes dos EUA tiveram um mandato
• Entenda como funciona o Colégio Eleitoral dos EUA

GABARITO: ASSUNTO : DOUBLE LINKS - 3º ANO

1 - B
2 - B

QUESTÃO SEM NÚMERO - B
3 - B
4 - B
5 - C
6 - D
7 - ORDEM: A - C - F  - E - B - D - G
8 - A -D - E (ALTENATIVAS CORRETAS)
9 -
A) MY GRANDPA NOT ONLY HAS HIGH BLOOD PRESSURE BUT ALSO SMOKES A LOT.
B) WE NOT ONLY PLAY SPORTS BUT ALSO GO WATCH THE GAMES.
C) LARRY NEITHER STUDY NOR DOES THE HOMEWORK.
D) BEN NOT ONLY ARRIVES ON TIME BUT ALSO WORK OVERTIME.
E) I NEITHER EAT FAST FOOD NOR DRINK ALCOHOL.
10 -
A) C
B) D
C) A

Presidente de órgão responsável por Enem deixa cargo

26/01/2012 18:07

Folha Online

O Ministério da Educação confirmou nesta quinta-feira a primeira mudança na sua cúpula, com a saída de Malvina Tuttman da presidência do Inep. O órgão é responsável pela realização do Enem (Exame Nacional do Ensino Médio).
O Inep informou que a saída da professora, que é ex-reitora da UniRio, foi decidida em reunião com o novo ministro da Educação, Aloizio Mercadante.
Em uma nota no site do Inep, Malvina afirma que viveu intensamente o órgão e aprendeu o valor de ser uma "inepiana".
"Saio fisicamente desse importante instituto, mas me sentirei sempre presente em cada sonho realizado e em cada ação desenvolvida pelos servidores do Inep. Para avançar na educação, o Brasil precisa de um Inep forte e o instituto está pronto para cumprir este desafio".
O principal cotado para assumir a sua vaga é Luiz Cláudio Costa, atual secretário de Ensino Superior do MEC.
Ainda na tarde desta quinta-feira, a secretária de Educação Básica do ministério, Maria do Pilar Lacerda, informou que também está deixando o cargo.
Ela postou em seu perfil no Twitter que será substituída pelo membro do CNE Cesar Callegaria. "Daqui a pouco, primeira reunião de transição com o novo secretário de educação básica, César Callegari. Desejo sorte, energia e bom humor!".
No fim da tarde de quinta-feira, o Ministério da Educação confirmou também a saída de Lacerda. As duas foram comunicadas hoje pelo ministro Aloizio Mercadante de que não permaneceriam no cargo.
O MEC afirma que as mudanças são "próprias de uma nova gestão e que não têm nenhuma conotação política". A pasta afirma que novas mudanças ocorrerão e que os substitutos serão anunciados "oportunamente".
GESTÃO
Malvina Tuttman completou neste mês um ano a frente do Inep. A professora assumiu para tentar corrigir problemas na realização do Enem e no Sisu (Sistema de Seleção Único), que usa o exame como critério para selecionar os candidatos para as instituições públicas de ensino superior.
A última edição do Enem antes de sua posse havia apresentado uma série de falhas na impressão das provas. O Sisu também apresentou problemas de lentidão no momento da inscrição e alguns candidatos conseguiram acessar pela internet dados dos concorrentes, o que o Ministério Público Federal classificou como vazamento.
Poucos meses depois de Malvina assumir o cargo, o Inep anunciou que seriam realizadas duas edições do Enem em 2012, uma delas no primeiro semestre, além da outra tradicionalmente realizada em outubro. Uma portaria do órgão estabeleceu inclusive as datas para o exame do início do ano: 28 e 29 de abril.
O ministro Fernando Haddad, que saiu para concorrer à prefeitura de São Paulo, enfrentou há uma semana o desgaste de anunciar o cancelamento do exame pois uma consultoria contratada apontou que não haveria condições.
Além disso, foi na gestão da professora Malvina que alunos do Colégio Christus tiveram acesso antecipado a 14 questões do Enem. Isso porque dois cadernos de um pré-teste do exame, realizado em outubro de 2010 no colégio, foram copiados por funcionários do colégio e as questões, exibidas aos alunos.
A Polícia Federal indiciou um professor e uma coordenadora do Christus por estelionato, por conta do vazamento. O colégio nega a participação dos dois.

25/01/2012 19h09 - Atualizado em 25/01/2012 19h29

Justiça intima Inep sobre pedido de pré-teste do Enem pelo MPF-CE

Ministério Público Federal do Ceará pede liberação dos pré-testes do Enem.
Procurador suspeita de que vazaram mais de 14 questões do exame.

Do G1 CE

Comente agora

A Justiça Federal no Ceará intimou nesta quarta-feira (25) o Instituto Nacional de Educação Profissional (Inep) e a União Federal para se manifestarem no prazo de cinco dias sobre o pedido do Ministério Público Federal no Ceará para liberar 30 cadernos de pré-teste do Exame Nacional do Ensino Médio (Enem).
O pedido para liberar o acesso aos cadernos foi feito pelo procurador da república no Ceará Oscar Costa Filho. O procurador suspeita que mais de 14 questões foram antecipadas pelo Colégio Christus, de Fortaleza. O Inep informou que, caso a Justiça determine pela liberação dos pré-testes, o órgão cumprirá o que for decidido pela Justiça.
O Inep confirma que 14 questões usadas no Enem foram antecipadas pela escola no Ceará. Por conta do vazamento, dois funcionários da escola, um professor e uma coordenadora, foram indiciados por estelionato.

O advogado da escola, Sérgio Rebouças, diz que os funcionários "não têm qualquer participação" no vazamento das questões. Em depoimento à Polícia Federal, o professor indiciado afirmou que encontrou o caderno do pré-teste sobre um mesa, de acordo com o Fantástico, que teve acesso ao inquérito policial.
A escola Christus foi uma das selecionadas para sediar o pré-teste, realizado um ano antes do Enem para avaliar o nível das questões. O pré-teste usa, inclusive, questões semelhantes às usadas na prova do Enem.
PF pede informações sobre banco de itens
O procurador Costa Filho afirma ter se baseado em depoimentos de pessoas que fizeram a prova e disse que a maioria das questões do Enem 2011 foram usadas no pré-teste de 2010. "O MEC não estava em condições de fazer a prova porque não tinham itens suficientes no banco pré-testado. O que aconteceu? Eles tiveram de usar aqueles itens que foram pré-testados em 2010, que estavam disponíveis", afirmou.
Ainda segundo o procurador, em qualquer caderno que fosse copiado havia questões coincidentes com a prova. "Isso está no relatório da Polícia Federal e isso está favorecendo a fraude. Quem tem acesso ao pré-teste, tem acesso à prova".
Nesta quarta-feira (25), a Polícia Federal solicitou ao Inep informações sobre a quantidade de questões que formam o banco de itens do Enem, quantas foram pré-testadas e em que ano. A polícia também pediu que sejam apresentados todos os cadernos de prova do pré-teste aplicado em 2010.
Acesso a redações do Enem
Na terça-feira (24), o presidente do Tribunal Regional Federal da 5ª Região (TRF-5), Paulo Roberto de Oliveira, suspendeu a liminar da Justiça Federal no Ceará que determinava ao MEC o acesso às provas e espelhos de correção das redações do Enem 2011 para todos os candidatos do País que participaram do Sistema de Seleção Unificada (Sisu). O pedido foi feito pelo Ministério Público Federal.
Na decisão, o presidente do TRF-5 sublinha “saltar aos olhos a mais aparente politização das questões relativas ao Enem. Se, de um lado, o exame ainda não ostenta – é fato a se lamentar – a qualidade operacional desejada, de outro não pode ser ignorado o descuido – inexiste palavra mais amena para dizê-lo – com que vem sendo judicialmente combatido”. A decisão cabe recurso ao Pleno do TRF-5.
Histórico
O Enem apresentou problemas nas três últimas edições do exame, desde quando passou a ser usado como forma de acesso às instituições públicas de ensino superior - em 2009, houve furto de provas da gráfica; em 2010, problemas com a impressão dos cadernos de provas; e, em 2011, vazamento de questões em uma apostila distribuída a estudantes de um colégio em Fortaleza.
Na sexta-feira (20), o MEC decidiu cancelar a edição do Enem que seria realizada em abril deste ano. Uma portaria de 18 de maio de 2011 havia anunciado que, a partir de 2012, o Enem seria realizado duas vezes por ano. A mesma portaria havia fixado a data da primeira edição do exame para os dias 28 e 29 de abril, e afirmado que a data da segunda edição só seria divulgada posteriormente. Em nota, o ministério agora afirma que, neste ano, a única edição do Enem acontecerá nos dias 3 e 4 de novembro.
A presidente Dilma Rousseff garantiu a realização de duas edições do Enem em 2013.

MEC cancela edição de abril do Enem

Exame será aplicado apenas em 3 e 4 de novembro

da redação | 23/01/2012 10h 59

O Ministério da Educação (MEC) decidiu cancelar a edição do Exame Nacional do Ensino Médio (Enem) que seria realizada em 28 e 29 de abril deste ano. Com a decisão, o exame volta a ter apenas uma edição, que será aplicada em 3 e 4 de novembro.


O MEC solicitou um levantamento à Modulo Security, empresa que faz a gestão de risco do Enem, que concluiu que as duas edições de 2012 seriam inviáveis para a estrutura logística do exame. A conclusão foi tirada depois de consulta às entidades envolvidas na organização da prova: o consórcio Cespe-Cesganrio, os Correios e a gráfica responsável pela impressão das provas. Com isso, o governo divulgou em nota o cancelamento da edição do exame no primeiro semestre.

O ministro da Educação, Fernando Haddad, já tinha indicado a possibilidade de não haver o exame em abril. Desde 2009, quando se iniciou o projeto de substituir os vestibulares tradicionais das instituições federais pelo Enem, o MEC sinaliza a intenção de o exame ser aplicados duas vezes ao ano para dar mais chances aos estudantes.

Depois da decisão do Ministério Público que determina a disponibilização de uma cópia da correção da redação para todos participantes do Enem 2011, o ministro também havia afirmado que a exigência de envio das vistas das provas poderia prejudicar a aplicação do exame em duas edições.