In the truth to save the planet is not difficult, what it is difficult is to make with that the people stop to dissimulate, and to wait for the others to take an attitude that saves the planet, she is not necessary to wait for great attitudes, is enough that all we let us take small, as to save water, to use recycled material more, not to pollute rivers lakes and etc. But without a doubt none is necessary that the countries diminish the amount of pollutants emitted in air through the chimneys of manufacture and industries, what it is most difficult, therefore if the countries to diminish the amount of emitted pollutants this also will diminish its production, that it means reduction of profits, what nobody wants.

                                                                                           Ádriann Matheus

why is difficult to save the planet ?

Nowadays, it is difficult to save our own planet, because each one has the duty and the obligation of doing its part, even so a lot of people is not aware about preservation of the environment. Like this instead of preserving the nature they destroys it. In many cities the garbage produced by the population is accumulated in inappropriate places without selective collection. The population, also, doesn't collaborate in the preservation of the planet. A lot of people trow garbage everywhere, they chop down trees, they provoke fire and etc.

Why is so hard to save the planet?

We live in a digital age, of the information, of the dinamis. In the middle of the so much globalization, we stop to preocupy about the planet that so much offers to us now a days we to discren with a bank crises of some power nations and the goverment applies millions of dolars to help. In hewever when we talk about save the planet, the money is inasccessible , the money is not the dispose ! This will end ?

Why is so hard to save the planet?

The  biggest difficulty in save the planet is lack of consciousness of people, because now what greenhouse is a chaos nature are big responsible by emission of CO².Therefore is necessary that society eases that situation: each one doing  part.

The global warming is created mainly by emissions of CO2, in great part coming for industries that produce it in high numbers. Whe we about production we assimilates to capitalism that the more produces, better is. And how to save the planet when your worst enemy it socio of capitalism? And the coutries that more pollute are capitalist , that aim first its production, its growth and development, and putin second plan to planet that we live without measuring that industral and emissions of pollutants goes against to what we call of "SUSTENTAINABILITY" .

Aluno: Alexandre Nascimento

Why is so hard to save the planet?

    Nowadays the capitalism dominate the world and this idealism is straight linked with consume .when to do this a question? It is difficult to save the world if the men that do no want to or do no have sensitivity in relationship when the problem is the planet; because lack of warning for the bad use of nature is not the reason. Profit is the main point in capitalism, therefore is more interesting to have profit and destroy the planet than invest in its rescue.  

                                                                                                                     Samara dos Santos Lima.

WORLD FINALS

 

Since the first industrial revolution the world passed for an difficult period. Factories and cars are the most polluters that exist, the CO2 generated by them cause climate changes and cause the greenhouse effect.

Today it is difficult to solve this problem because not all countries want to collaborate with the reduction of emission of gases. The capitalism left us hostage of money and with that also of productivity and when a coutry produces more, more pollution it causes and more difficult is to salve the problem.

Why is so hard to save the planet ?

Day by day it is difficult save the planet, with many disasters, melting of the glacier seas and city polluted finally with so global warming that is provoked byus, human beings obstructing the possibilities of we he a world healthier.
It is difficult save the planet because we do not do enough to try to improve the earth where we live, we could try at least, to reduce the pollution.



                                                                                                Anna karolline Carvalho Guimarães.

Why is so hard to save the planet ?

This is a question that many people search the answer  however save  the planet is a well difficult task because so many things should be analyzed and put in practice, such as: the reduction of emission of gases, the drecrease of deforestation and  reforestation.

In a capitalist society the main factor it is the industrialization that prevents the contribution of society to save the world.

Like this agreement between the countries would of  extreme importance  for the planet, but could to get in paper should run

                              

How to save the planet?

 The capitalism has brought damage to the planet and in consequence to the humans.

We are insert in a totally consumerist society thanks to the technological evolution present in all world, this world be a negative factor for environment.

In the XXI century would be indispensable its use, but we can’t ignore the consequence of it we must search and put in practice the best possible solution for this problem.   

In your opnion, why is it so hard to save the planet ?

Because lack of awareness in people and sensitivity to projects the preservation of environment. 

These attitudes future consequences such as a signifcant increase of temperature and the exhausted of water in part of the globe.

Recently it was created a challenge to advance a global agreement that aimed the reduction of emission of greenhouse gases in atmosphere, however not all the countries were pleased about to cut these emissions.

The discussion about of how to save the planet is something discussed for a long time, but the policies about that project is not seen with extreme importance an alarming fact that worries future generations.

Why is it so hard to save the planet ?

    Is not easy to save the planet from the threats , where, the negative balance between the needs and availability has incriased each year. The failures, the degradation and huge factores reveal their own whys. Meenting the changing the paradigm of society. To try to alleviate these problems, is necessary to handle other forms " inner" the planet , using different energy sources , the way of the usage of the soil, moving deep the economy, consume less and better.

Why is it so hard to save the planet ?

   In a capitalist world , where the single appreciation is by the profit , the preoccupation with the enveronment becomes useless.So conferences and agreements among the countries has happenine , with the goal todo better world. But these countries do not enter in concordance by the fact that productivety can suffer damage.

  One of the main enveronmental agreements was the Kyoto Protocol , which aimed the decrease of pollutantes in atmosphere as main the CO2. This treaty emerged by the that process of industrialization. But one of the main pollutants countries , is USA, do not segned the treaty ,dificulting an efficiente action of a overall agreement.

 This difficultie to get a broad agreemet in has significant effect , since the main pollutantes do not assume its true paper againest enveronmental problems . Because , they aim in ferst their profitabelitus with benefits those countries that pollute less.

Why is it so hard to save the planet ?

That the planet is in decline everybody knows. But, why the most of the people behaves like this is a lie? Everyday, we see in television the challenge that the earth has faced about the enviromental problems. And even so, the men keep degrading our environmental. Although the efforts of some people to save what remains of the earth planet, what we see is a try to soften the global calamity. This is happening because the importance that people give to the money today. We live to work and we work to consume. The addiction to consumption is increasingly rooted in the people. Even in socialist societies, the people become capitalists. And all this "talk" about to save the planet is coming a global joke when the countries are "interested in the matter".

In your opnion, why is it so hard to save the planet?

the Global Warning is an normal process taht occurs with the planet, however, mankind with emissions of gas (CO2, CH4 e N2O mainly) and the deforestation, accelerate that process, puting risk the survival in earth. Several agreements, about climate have already made, the more important The Kyoto Protocol. That has the objective to decrease the emissions of gas in more polluted countries, however, not all countries are willing to do sth to decrease its production because of greenhouse effect, making difficut to find a solution for a critical problem to ignored by developed countries.

Why is it so hard save the planet ?

We have in highly capitalist World in whitch makes its denotative meaning, wich is the host of healthily and without aggression to it, and passes to the connotative sense for some coutries than that is of contemp, such coutries are not the "low level" or poor, but those who use and abuse of natural resouces do not give a damn about the consequences that will surely come, though it is noticeable the feeling of security, for taking the temperature increse as an exzample, we see thal coutries that cause this problem do not suffer from its consequences, soon they arranje a way to circumvent this, because those other coutries, so lucky and so did not suffer from this problem and are left with the felling of inefficiency.

The most difficultie to ave planet is the men thei do not think in commo and cause, florest devastation.

The world knowsand peo ple know the future will not see big florest and weather. From now we start suffering with greenhouse effect.

The climate change day by day is more confusion and strange, for example: antartida little bylittle the local ice is melting and cause catastrophe and disaster. Because the sea deepness cause floods in diferents regions the disafforestation causes dry region therainis less favoured, inthat region that happen lackof water and people and animal starttos uffer; that happensin difarents parts of the world.

Durban brought new ideas but insufficient to help florest devastation around the world. People know there are big florest in this planet and they are thinking what to do tobring back the question frou the middle to the center of struggle because the climate change is coming very quick.

Why is it so hard save the planet ?

 The earth planet is our house, this is why, we must to take care of it with love and care. And above all preserve the nature for that we have a good quality of life.

 Unfortunately many people do not have conscience of it, for exemple, the industries that pollute, the farmers that deforest and the families that waste water and food. Those factors complicate the health of earth which is going from bad to worse, because that is very difficult save the planet, and that can bring us irreversible consequences.

 We have to organize the awareness of people, denounce enviranmental and charge the proper punishments. 

Maria Graziela Andrade. 

We live in a captalist world where the people are warried in consume, consume and consume, they don't remenber that have a planet to take care. Consuption is the cause for the disease of the earth, we want a pratical life, more comfortable with out know that comfortability only brings problems.

Global warming is our great challenge we need to win this challenge to survive, if we want, is not difficult.

Why is it so hard save the planet ?

         Nowadys, the earth planet has been one of the uttermost victims of global warming that is caused by human being. Many of these causes has been present in a direct and exposed way, due to a lack of raising of awareness in people .

         The duty to help ourselves, sometimes seems a problem too big for most of society. However, save the world, may seem an easy task before an attitude that need all attention. So, the idea and perhaps the questioning of many countries can be resolved in the manner how human being sees themselves about that great globalization.

In your opinion, why isit so hard to save the planet?

Through this capitalist world, where the government is based in profit, and the countries act in owns interest, is more easy to save a bank, than the planet.
Being the center of the capitalism an having the biggest economy in the world, the United States of America is also the biggest polluter, and through its hegemonia it was the country that more gave work for sign the kyoto protocol.
In a capitalist world, reduce the pollution it is create unemployment and reduce profit.

                    Who will save the planet?

Currently it's very difficult save the planet, because the main polluters not joined the "saviors" of planet that is the Kyoto Protocol. Those countries that do not joined the agreement were United States of America and China that have the objective to produce more, in other words, increasingly pollution in the planet.

The United States for being a world power produces a lot and not lose the status of "higher potency", already the China also produces in large scale trying to exceed the United States. But who will bear the consequence? Probably the planet will not support that dispute so fierce to see who polluter more.

Abdias Fernandes Carvalho

Why is it so hard save the planet?

While the people laugh, the planet cry !
The difficulty in save the planet coming from good part of the big ambition of the developed nation and underdeveloped nations are seeking grow more and seed by a capitalist greed that daily take people fat living a consumerist exaggerated life and it is by this fact that is given so little importance to the preservation of the planet because what matter consumerist many it is the profit.

Entenda como funcionam as eleições americanas

Republicano que disputará presidência contra Obama em 6 de novembro será definido em prévias do partido que podem durar até julho

Carolina Cimenti, de Nova York | 02/01/2012 08:00

Foto: Getty Images

Pré-candidatos republicanos (esq. para dir.) Santorum, Perry, Romney, Gingrich, Ron Paul, Bachmann e Huntsman são vistos antes de debate em 15 de dezembro de 2011

Com o cáucus de terça-feira em Iowa, começa a disputa entre pré-candidatos republicanos para definir quem representará o partido contra o presidente dos EUA, o democrata Barack Obama, nas eleições presidenciais de 6 de novembro.
Após a desistência em 3 de dezembro de Herman Cain em meio a denúncias de que assediou sexualmente funcionárias e manteve um caso extraconjugal por 13 anos, há sete candidatos na disputa (em ordem alfabética): Jon Huntsman, Michelle Bachmann, Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich, Ron Paul, Rick Perry e Rick Santorum.
Infográfico: Veja infográfico com miniperfil dos concorrentes
A previsão é de que os eleitores participem até fim de junho de prévias nos 50 Estados americanos para definir o candidato do Partido Republicano, que esteve pela última vez no poder durante os dois mandatos de George W. Bush (2001-2009).
Se a disputa não for acirrada, há chances também de ser definida mais cedo, na chamada Super Terça-Feira de 6 de março, quando haverá votações em mais de dez Estados.
Agenda: Confira o calendário da disputa presidencial dos EUA
Cada Estado escolhe qual tipo de prévia adotar: primárias ou cáucus. E o que são cada uma delas?
A primária é uma votação secreta tradicional, com urnas e papéis, organizada normalmente pelo governo local e aberta a todos os eleitores registrados. Nas primárias fechadas, os eleitores podem participar apenas da votação do partido em que estão registrados (ou seja, só votam em uma prévia republicana os eleitores dessa legenda). Nas abertas, podem votar na primária do partido que escolherem, independentemente de sua filiação partidária. A maioria dos Estado faz primárias fechadas.

Os cáucuses, que também podem ser fechados ou abertos, são encontros que incluem debates, discursos e divisão de grupos. Quando eles começam, os eleitores se dividem de acordo com o candidato que apoiam. Para persuadir os indecisos a aderir a seu grupo, os eleitores discursam em apoio a seu candidato. No final, os organizadores contam quantos votos cada candidato recebeu.
Votação indireta
Mas nos dois casos (cáucus e primárias), os votos não vão diretamente para os candidatos. Eles na verdade determinam a quantidade de delegados (ou representantes) que cada candidato terá na convenção nacional do partido - na qual um candidato será oficialmente aclamado depois das primárias e cáucuses.
O número de delegados de cada Estado é definido pela população. A Califórnia, por exemplo, tem 55 representantes, enquanto Nova York conta com 29 e o Alasca somente com 3. Por isso, é mais importante vencer em alguns Estados do que em outros.
Para distribuir os delegados, os democratas usam um método proporcional. Cada candidato recebe o número de delegados correspondente ao percentual de votos nas primárias ou cáucuses. No Partido Republicano, um Estado pode escolher o método proporcional ou o do "ganhador leva tudo", no qual o candidato que recebeu a maioria dos votos em determinada prévia ganha todos os delegados correspondentes.
O vencedor entre os pré-candidatos republicanos será anunciado oficialmente na convenção do partido em Tampa, na Flórida, prevista para 27 de agosto. Como o presidente Obama já anunciou sua decisão de concorrer à reeleição, os democratas não realizarão prévias no partido neste ano. De qualquer forma, o líder americano será aclamado oficialmente como candidato do partido na convenção democrata, que ocorre em Charlotte, Carolina do Norte, em 3 de setembro.
Eleição propriamente dita
Em 6 de novembro, os eleitores comparecerão às urnas para escolher entre Obama e o futuro candidato republicano. E, assim como nas primárias e cáucuses, os votos em cada Estado serão usados para determinar quantos delegados cada um terá no chamado Colégio Eleitoral - que determina o presidente americano.
Saiba mais: Entenda como funciona o Colégio Eleitoral americano
Como já ocorreu no passado, há a possibilidade de um candidato com maior porcentual de votos populares não vencer por não conquistar número suficiente de delegados no Colégio Eleitoral. Exemplo disso foi a eleição de 2000, quando Bush foi eleito pela primeira vez ao vencer o democrata Al Gore.
Naquele ano, Bush recebeu 47,87% do total dos votos, enquanto Al Gore obteve 48,38%. Mas, como venceu em Estados com maior peso no Colégio Eleitoral (após semanas de contestação na Justiça da Flórida), mudou-se para a Casa Branca no ano seguinte apesar de ter recebido 500 mil votos a menos que seu concorrente.

Eleições nos EUA 2012

• Veja o especial sobre eleições nos EUA 2012
• Em 2012, pior rival de Obama é seu próprio governo
• Quem são os principais pré-candidatos republicanos?
• Ocupe Wall Street deve influenciar eleições nos EUA
• Internet será arma crucial na campanha dos EUA
• Radicalismo do Tea Party pode dividir republicanos
• Quem paga a campanha presidencial dos EUA?
• Saiba quais presidentes dos EUA tiveram um mandato
• Entenda como funciona o Colégio Eleitoral dos EUA